水草情迷

唔知大家仲記唔記得太極既 - 沉默風暴？

_________________
Bye Bye Mash BB! 你要保重， 你永遠係我既乖BB。

唔記得........

_________________

I think most people already misunderstand what HK education's saintly target. As all of us know, most subjects, from primary school to secondary school, are useless. The situation is slightly better in university, but in my opinion, they are still useless. In many other countries, their education is target for what their society needs in the future, e.g. Singapore. But why in HK, even at present, is still teaching geography, chemisty, biology, additional math... which all are in minimal demand in local careers? Why this kind of education system have been running for 3 decades and not likely to be changed? Because the target is actually not related to the subjects at all!

HK education's target, is to develope students' ability to learn fast, to solve different kinds of problems, to face different kinds of difficulties, to organize all the works on hands in the correct order. And the students recently are simply failed to do any of them. They turn to after school lessions, memory-based, overtime... which these methods are only useful to complete the syllabus, but not the aim of education.

I found out these early in my days in university. In year 1 first semester, I got all B. But after I was disappointed by the syllabus (again), I got 1 less B per year, to only 1 B in my final semester(heheh... I got no A), however, I spent like 3 times less studying than all the others. I rearranged my classes so that I can do part-time jobs, play(mainly play! bowling, snooker, karaoke, online games...). I spent 3 weeks to finish my final year project (which was the only B for my final semester), while others spent more than 3 months. I was playing EverQuest late till 04:00 the day before final exam, then the next morning I studied for few hours and then attended the exam in the evening. During the exam, I was calculating, how many marks do I need to get pass? I went throught the paper and targeted several questions which I had most confidence, knowing that if I got them right, I'll get a C. And that's it. The time limited for the session was 3 hours, and I walked away with a C in 1 hour 15 minutes, probably the first one exit the hall.

Today, students are just digging too deep to the subjects themselves. They spent 99% time to learn the subjects, rather than "how to learn", "how to learn easier", "how to learn faster".

The mistake done by HKEA, however, gave me something I should be delighted for: the students can still observe. They KNOW how to solve the problem, well, only in a wrong direction this time.

_________________
CJN 的草缸

我完全認同...
去一個廁所要幾耐?最多比你5分鐘..5分鐘你記唔記得晒咁多答案呀..其實搵唔搵得晒d答案都係一個問題..
人地出到

OKEY,
特別係靚女 係......改變唔到既事實

_________________
~狗會~有興趣可以加入
http://www.hkschnauzer.net

其實出貓呢樣野, 一d都唔新鮮. 由遠古有考試以來就有!
今次同之前既唔同, 只是在於應用在"新科技"上. 唔計呢樣, 基本上同偷睇....冇分別.

但之前點解咁多人, 長篇大論寫咁多字話不是呢? 時間多? 手痕?
NO...... 而系見到大家對於此事既各種"平常心", "小意思", "唔出你笨o者", "個世界係咁la".....等睇法, 作出反應. 一件出貓既小風波事小, hk人大家既價值觀事大.

我地只在此發下"盧so"o者......

_________________

"盧so":

"一件出貓既小風波事小, hk人大家既價值觀事大." <-- 同意!!

"抵佢出到貓啦，係未?" <====
抵o既意思係乜? 值得去出貓? 值唔值... 無意見.. 公唔公平係另一回事... o岩唔o岩係另一回事...
我淨係覺得o既然可以有公平o既方法去善後, 去防止有人用不合規則o既方法去影響考試結果, 咁就應該去做... 我唔相信有讀書, 英文好o既, 會因為取消呢條問題而有損失.... 無讀書, 英文唔好o既, 會唔會淨係識得一題, 其他全部都唔識....

"去一個廁所要幾耐?最多比你5分鐘" <=== 考試局之前無紀錄... 要幾耐有幾耐... 要去幾多次,可以去幾多次....

"做好本份就ok.." <== 呢句同意建基於有公平o既基礎底下...

"代裕往往都比男生好..特別係靚女" <=== 同意....

"根本上,人一出世就係唔公平..點解人地有個富爸爸.但我有個窮爸爸...這樣公平嗎?咁樣就已經唔公平啦..仲邊有公平可言呀.." <==
1)人一出世就唔公平, 唔代表無公平可言... 你唔著低褲唔代表呢個世界所有人都唔著低褲....
2) 所以好多人同組織都嘗試去定一 D 規則或司法制度去保護弱勢社群, 防止奴隸制度同去教育低下階層....如果唔係出生嚮低下階層o既人, 無可能受教育, 無可能有知識, 無可能擺脫低下階層... 嚮香港已經有一個好健全o既制度俾你去受教育, 低下階層出身又去到上流社會o既亦有好多例子: 梁振英
3) 人地有個富爸爸, 你無, 但係人地亦有人俾人綁架o既機會...
有好多野你睇人好, 人睇你好...
嘗試去睇多 D 新聞, 去接觸多 D 唔同o既人同社會,
襯讀書時, 知多 D 自己o既社會比其他社會幾先進......

價值觀...... 例子...
有一群人去銀行拎把槍打劫, 劫走五千萬, 成功嚮現場逃退
1) 有幾多人有槍
2) 有幾多人咁冷靜去打劫
3) 有幾多人日光日白去打劫
就算真係有人過3關
試問又有幾多個呢?
佢肯過3關仲要博，抵佢打到劫啦，係未?
係唔係即係警察唔使做野? 尤得佢逍遙法外? 係唔係銀行唔使改善防盜, 繼續"抵"人打劫?

出貓... 唔o岩... 唔公平o既行為.... 唔應該鼓勵, 唔應該覺得好型/好醒/好有智慧... 唔應該給予應同...應該切法阻止... 應該防止有關決乏誠信o既行為得到好處... 世界好多野唔公平... 但係唔應該去指鹿為馬... 助紂為虐... 助長一班練精學懶o既下一代....

大家唔好將焦點放係

_________________
CJN 的草缸

[quote="CJN"].....出貓係普遍學生必經之路，就算冇做，都會諗過做。只有兩種人唔會，就係狀元級 (唔需要) 同低能級 (唔識)。

不過呢次最大責任唔

[quote="Andy Kong"][quote="CJN"].....出貓係普遍學生必經之路，就算冇做，都會諗過做。只有兩種人唔會，就係狀元級 (唔需要) 同低能級 (唔識)。

不過呢次最大責任唔

_________________
寶劍鋒從磨礪出，梅花香自苦寒來

[quote="Andy Kong"]Sorry, I cannot agree with you, not even a bit of what you said here.

最大責任係學生，HKEA 也難辭其咎。
我冇話過學生冇責任，不過，究竟出貓係天性，定係後天教育有問題？你認為一個人一出世乜都唔教，我唔計有冇學識，會識自律、會識分事非黑白？學生會出貓，一定係教育有問題！

最憎非禮強姦犯用受害人衣

_________________
CJN 的草缸

[quote="ShrimpTheLittle"]
Assume佢所提及"人"

_________________
CJN 的草缸

[quote="CJN"][quote="ShrimpTheLittle"]
Assume佢所提及"人"

_________________
寶劍鋒從磨礪出，梅花香自苦寒來

嘩......呢度個個臥虎藏龍, 冇幾個degree係手/傍身, 以後都唔敢出聲.
haha

不過3年一個degree.....part-time 可以3年一個咁堅?

_________________

因為早期

_________________
CJN 的草缸